Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.73GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 106W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce 400
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
902 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
-
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.264 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
25.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
601.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
50.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

106W
TDP
32W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
RV516
GF106-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
40 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy