Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs AMD FireStream 9270

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1518MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)
AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 84.10GB/s)
32 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1050 3 GB +94%
2.332 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2018
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 10
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1392 MHz
Base Clock
-
1518 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
84.10GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
6
SM Count
-
768
Shading Units
800
48
TMUs
40
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
72.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
36.43 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.332 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
72.86 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
160W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
RV770
GP107-301-K1-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy