Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs AMD FirePro S9150

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1630
1.828 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +177%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2022
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1740 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
8
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
2816
32
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
3.656 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Hawaii
TU117-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy