Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 129% (1785MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1630 +266%
1.828 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240 OEM
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2022
Release Date
Nov 2013
GeForce 16
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1740 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
8
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
320
32
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
3.656 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Oland
TU117-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy