Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1785MHz vs 1762MHz)
NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1630
1.828 TFLOPS
RTX A400 +48%
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2022
Release Date
Apr 2024
GeForce 16
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1740 MHz
Base Clock
1417 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
6
512
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

28.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
3.656 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GA107
TU117-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy