NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 219W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6
+358%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
0.622 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
Feb 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
30
896
Shading Units
240
56
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
219W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
G92B
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
G92-421-B1
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
