Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs NVIDIA NVS 4200M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs NVIDIA NVS 4200M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and 1024MB VRAM NVS 4200M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1125MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 4200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 30W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q +1376%
2.304 TFLOPS
NVS 4200M
0.156 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Feb 2011
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1125 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
1
1024
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.620 GPixel/s
72.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.480 GTexel/s
4.608 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
155.5 GFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GF119
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
N12P-NS1-S-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy