Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock1125MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q +66%
2.304 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile
1.385 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2020
Release Date
Jul 2019
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

930 MHz
Base Clock
-
1125 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.31 GPixel/s
72.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.62 GTexel/s
4.608 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1385 GFLOPS
2.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1385 GFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
86.56 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Polaris 23
N18P-G61-MP2
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GLM
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy