Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon 540

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon 540

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 1024MB VRAM AMD Radeon 540 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon 540 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +386%
4.416 TFLOPS
AMD Radeon 540
0.908 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Apr 2017
GeForce 16
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
32bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.93 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.39 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
908.5 GFLOPS
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
908.5 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
56.78 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Lexa
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO (215-0904018)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy