Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1160 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +2200%
4.416 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
0.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
120
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
45W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
RV630
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy