Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA NVS 310

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA NVS 310

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
1232 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +4316%
4.416 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 16
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
1
1280
Shading Units
48
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
20W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
GF119
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy