Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 220

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 220 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
1232 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (58W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +2966%
4.416 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 220
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Jan 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
6
1280
Shading Units
48
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
14.40 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
58W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
G94
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy