Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 340 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 27.20GB/s)
1184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 340 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +1618%
4.416 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 340 OEM
0.257 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Feb 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
850 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
27.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
12
1280
Shading Units
96
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
257.3 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
69W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
GT215
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GT215-301-A3
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy