Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs ATI Radeon HD 4720

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs ATI Radeon HD 4720

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 4720 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 21.34GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4720 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER +1050%
4.416 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4720
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Dec 2011
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
667 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
21.34GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
320
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

100W
TDP
55W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
RV730
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
RV730 XT (215-0719047)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy