Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs AMD Radeon R9 290X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 580W)
AMD Radeon R9 290X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (345.6GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
4.416 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290X2 +27%
5.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Jun 2014
GeForce 16
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1725 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
345.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
20
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
2816
80
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

55.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
138.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
176.0 GTexel/s
8.832 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.416 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.632 TFLOPS
138.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
704.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
580W
300 W
Suggested PSU
950 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
4x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Hawaii
TU116-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT (215-0852000)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy