NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
2.458 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
+21%
2.989 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2020
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1035 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
16
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.69 GPixel/s
76.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
93.41 GTexel/s
4.915 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.458 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.989 TFLOPS
76.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
373.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Amethyst
N18P-G62
GPU Variant
Amethyst PRO
(216-0872004)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3
