Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
776 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +1878%
2.849 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO
0.144 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
120
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

90W
TDP
35W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
RV630
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy