Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +8040%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 PCI
0.035 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Oct 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
2
896
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.900 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.800 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

90W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
GT216
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy