CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 405 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 405 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 90W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
+6231%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce 405 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
VS
GeForce 405 OEM
Graphics Card
Jun 2020
Release Date
Sep 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
TU106
GPU Name
GT218
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
GT218-300-B1
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Board Design
90W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI FireGL V7700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
2
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
3
AMD Radeon 660M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
4
AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
5
AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon HD 5950
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD Radeon HD 6950
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD FireStream 9170
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy