Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 130 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
848 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +2274%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 130 OEM
0.12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Mar 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
6
896
Shading Units
48
56
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
120.0 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

90W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
G94B
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy