Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
800 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 230 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +1087%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 230 OEM
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Apr 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
12
896
Shading Units
96
56
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
12
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

90W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
G92B
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
G92-159-B1
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy