NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages

Released 11 years and 9 months late

Boost Clock1590MHz

Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)

680 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (90W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +431%

2.849 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

0.536 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

VS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

Graphics Card

Jun 2020

Release Date

Sep 2008

GeForce 16

Generation

GeForce 200

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz

Base Clock

-

1590 MHz

Boost Clock

-

1500 MHz

Memory Clock

999 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

896MB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR3

128bit

Memory Bus

448bit

192.0GB/s

Bandwidth

111.9GB/s

Render Config

14

SM Count

27

-

Compute Units

-

896

Shading Units

216

56

TMUs

72

32

ROPs

28

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

-

1024 KB

L2 Cache

224 KB

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

16.13 GPixel/s

89.04 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

41.47 GTexel/s

5.699 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

2.849 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

536.5 GFLOPS

89.04 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

67.07 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU106

GPU Name

GT200

TU106-125-KAB-A1

GPU Variant

G200-103-A2

Turing

Architecture

Tesla 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

65 nm

10.8 billion

Transistors

1.4 billion

445 mm²

Die Size

576 mm²

Board Design

90W

TDP

182W

250 W

Suggested PSU

450 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

2x DVI 1x S-Video

1x 6-pin

Power Connectors

2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

11.1 (10_0)

4.6

OpenGL

3.3

3.0

OpenCL

1.1

1.3

Vulkan

N/A

7.5

CUDA

1.3

6.6

Shader Model

4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD Radeon HD 8570 OEM

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD Radeon R7 370

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon HD 4650

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

Related News

1

AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2

2

AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future

3

Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs

4

TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion

5

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time

6

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

7

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

8

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

9

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

10

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales