NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GA103

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GA103

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GA103 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages

Lower TDP (90W vs 200W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GA103 's Advantages

Released 1 years and 8 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1665MHz vs 1590MHz)

More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)

3968 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

2.849 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GA103 +468%

16.2 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

VS

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GA103

Graphics Card

Jun 2020

Release Date

Feb 2022

GeForce 16

Generation

GeForce 30

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz

Base Clock

1410 MHz

1590 MHz

Boost Clock

1665 MHz

1500 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

8GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

128bit

Memory Bus

256bit

192.0GB/s

Bandwidth

448.0GB/s

Render Config

14

SM Count

38

-

Compute Units

-

896

Shading Units

4864

56

TMUs

152

32

ROPs

80

-

Tensor Cores

152

-

RT Cores

38

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

4 MB

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

133.2 GPixel/s

89.04 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

253.1 GTexel/s

5.699 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

16.20 TFLOPS

2.849 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

16.20 TFLOPS

89.04 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

253.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU106

GPU Name

GA103S

TU106-125-KAB-A1

GPU Variant

GA103-200-A1

Turing

Architecture

Ampere

TSMC

Foundry

Samsung

12 nm

Process Size

8 nm

10.8 billion

Transistors

Unknown

445 mm²

Die Size

496 mm²

Board Design

90W

TDP

200W

250 W

Suggested PSU

550 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 6-pin

Power Connectors

1x 12-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

7.5

CUDA

8.6

6.6

Shader Model

6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

1

ATI FireGL V7700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

2

AMD Radeon 660M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

3

AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

4

AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

5

AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

6

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD Radeon HD 6950

Related News

1

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

2

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

3

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

4

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

5

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

6

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

7

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

8

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports

9

Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip

10

AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly