Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 10% (1590MHz vs 1440MHz)
Lower TDP (90W vs 165W)
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU106
2.849 TFLOPS
PG506 232 +262%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2020
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 16
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
56
896
Shading Units
3584
56
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
165W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
GA100
TU106-125-KAB-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
8.0
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy