NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages

Released 6 years and 8 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 104% (1590MHz vs 780MHz)

More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

576 additional rendering cores

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages

Lower TDP (30W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 +470%

2.849 TFLOPS

Radeon R7 240

0.499 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

VS

Radeon R7 240

Graphics Card

Jun 2020

Release Date

Oct 2013

GeForce 16

Generation

Volcanic Islands

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz

Base Clock

730 MHz

1590 MHz

Boost Clock

780 MHz

1500 MHz

Memory Clock

900 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

2GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

DDR3

128bit

Memory Bus

128bit

192.0GB/s

Bandwidth

28.80GB/s

Render Config

14

SM Count

-

Compute Units

5

896

Shading Units

320

56

TMUs

20

32

ROPs

8

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

16 KB (per CU)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

256 KB

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

6.240 GPixel/s

89.04 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

15.60 GTexel/s

5.699 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

2.849 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

499.2 GFLOPS

89.04 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

-

Graphics Processor

TU106

GPU Name

Oland

TU106-125-KAB-A1

GPU Variant

Oland PRO (215-0837015)

Turing

Architecture

GCN 1.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

28 nm

10.8 billion

Transistors

0.95 billion

445 mm²

Die Size

77 mm²

Board Design

90W

TDP

30W

250 W

Suggested PSU

200 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA

1x 6-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 (11_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

1.2

1.3

Vulkan

1.2

7.5

CUDA

-

6.6

Shader Model

5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

1

ATI FireGL V7700 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

2

AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

3

AMD Radeon 660M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

4

AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

5

AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

6

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT AGP

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD Radeon HD 8740 OEM

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD