Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA CMP 70HX

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA CMP 70HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 8GB VRAM CMP 70HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1590MHz vs 1395MHz)
NVIDIA CMP 70HX 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (608.3GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
5248 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
2.849 TFLOPS
CMP 70HX +501%
17.14 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Jan 2021
GeForce 16
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
1365 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1188 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
608.3GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
48
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
6144
56
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.9 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
267.8 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
17.14 TFLOPS
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.14 TFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
267.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
GA104
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GA104-100-A1
Turing
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy