Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI FirePro V4800

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI FirePro V4800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +359%
2.849 TFLOPS
FirePro V4800
0.62 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
400
56
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
69W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Redwood
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy