Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 210 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +7205%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce 210 Rev. 2
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Oct 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
2
896
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
31W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
GT218
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GT218-325-B1
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy