Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8400 GS PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 5.328GB/s)
888 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +12850%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400 GS PCI
0.022 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Dec 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5.328GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
896
Shading Units
8
56
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.268 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.268 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
G98
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
G98-400-U2
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

80W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy