Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +6231%
2.849 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT PCI
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Aug 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
2
896
Shading Units
16
56
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
G96C
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy