NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 635 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages

Released 6 years and 9 months late

Boost Clock1590MHz

More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)

512 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GT 635 OEM 's Advantages

Lower TDP (35W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +283%

2.849 TFLOPS

GeForce GT 635 OEM

0.743 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

VS

GeForce GT 635 OEM

Graphics Card

Jul 2020

Release Date

Oct 2013

GeForce 16

Generation

GeForce 600

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz

Base Clock

-

1590 MHz

Boost Clock

-

1500 MHz

Memory Clock

900 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

1024MB

GDDR6

Memory Type

DDR3

128bit

Memory Bus

64bit

192.0GB/s

Bandwidth

14.40GB/s

Render Config

14

SM Count

-

Compute Units

-

896

Shading Units

384

56

TMUs

32

ROPs

8

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

16 KB (per SMX)

1024 KB

L2 Cache

512 KB

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

7.736 GPixel/s

89.04 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

30.94 GTexel/s

5.699 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

2.849 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

742.7 GFLOPS

89.04 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

30.94 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU116

GPU Name

GK208

TU116-150-KA-A1

GPU Variant

-

Turing

Architecture

Kepler 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

28 nm

6.6 billion

Transistors

1.02 billion

284 mm²

Die Size

87 mm²

Board Design

80W

TDP

35W

250 W

Suggested PSU

200 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 (11_0)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.1

7.5

CUDA

3.5

6.6

Shader Model

5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA T400 4 GB

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD Radeon 660M

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA Tesla P4

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs Intel Arc A750

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs AMD Radeon 680M

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX550

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition

Related News

1

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

2

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

3

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

4

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

5

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

6

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

7

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

8

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

9

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

10

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports