Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI Radeon HD 4750

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 vs ATI Radeon HD 4750

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +205%
2.849 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4750
0.934 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2020
Release Date
Sep 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1410 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
640
56
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

50.88 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.68 GPixel/s
89.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.36 GTexel/s
5.699 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.849 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
934.4 GFLOPS
89.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
186.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
RV740
TU116-150-KA-A1
GPU Variant
RV740 PRO
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.826 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
137 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy