Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD FirePro S9170

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD FirePro S9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170 +75%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Jul 2015
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
2816
56
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Hawaii
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy