CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon R9 290
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon R9 290
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
AMD Radeon R9 290
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 290 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 290
+62%
4.849 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 1650
3593
Radeon R9 290
+2%
3681
GeForce GTX 1650
VS
Radeon R9 290
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Nov 2013
GeForce 16
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
40
896
Shading Units
2560
56
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
60.61 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
151.5 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.849 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
606.1 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
Hawaii
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii PRO (215-0852020)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²
Board Design
75W
TDP
275W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA T400
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 OEM
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs ATI Radeon X1650 AGP
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
Related News
1
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
2
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
3
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
4
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
5
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
6
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
7
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
8
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
9
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
10
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy