Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Boost Clock1665MHz
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X2 +188%
8.602 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 16
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
Unknown
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Capsaicin
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT C9
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy