Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD FirePro S9150

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD FirePro S9150

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 and 16GB VRAM FirePro S9150 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)
AMD FirePro S9150 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1650
2.984 TFLOPS
FirePro S9150 +69%
5.069 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1485 MHz
Base Clock
-
1665 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
44
896
Shading Units
2816
56
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

53.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
93.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
158.4 GTexel/s
5.967 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.984 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.069 TFLOPS
93.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.534 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Hawaii
TU117-300-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
235W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy