CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
AMD FirePro S9300 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (120W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.1GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660
5.027 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2
+58%
7.987 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660
VS
FirePro S9300 X2
Graphics Card
Mar 2019
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
192bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.1GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
1408
Shading Units
4096
88
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Capsaicin
TU116-300-A1
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Board Design
120W
TDP
300W
300 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GP104
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon RX 570
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon R7 265
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs ATI Radeon HD 4730 OEM
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD FirePro S9150
Related News
1
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
2
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
3
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
4
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
5
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
6
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
7
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
8
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
9
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
10
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy