Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD FireStream 9170

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.1GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 +911%
5.027 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2019
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.1GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
320
88
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
105W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
RV670
TU116-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy