Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD FireStream 9270

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.1GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (120W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 +318%
5.027 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2019
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 16
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.1GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
800
88
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
160W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
RV770
TU116-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy