Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 5670

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 5670

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5670 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
ATI Radeon HD 5670 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
184 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (64W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 5670 +15%
0.62 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
Evergreen
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
5
216
Shading Units
400
72
TMUs
20
28
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Redwood
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
Redwood XT (215-0757002)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Board Design

171W
TDP
64W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy