CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 185W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1852MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3624 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP
+2552%
14.22 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Jan 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1627 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1852 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
192bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
27
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
216
Shading Units
3840
72
TMUs
120
28
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
30
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.90 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.22 TFLOPS
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.22 TFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.2 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT200
GPU Name
GA106
G200-103-A2
GPU Variant
GA106-400-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
12 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²
Board Design
182W
TDP
185W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 6790
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 8860 OEM
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon RX 7700
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI FirePro V7900
7
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 6950
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GS
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy