CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3850 AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 52.99GB/s)
ATI Radeon HD 3850 AGP 's Advantages
104 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 182W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
+25%
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3850 AGP
0.428 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
Radeon HD 3850 AGP
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
828 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
52.99GB/s
Render Config
27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
216
Shading Units
320
72
TMUs
16
28
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.69 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.69 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
427.5 GFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.50 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT200
GPU Name
RV670
G200-103-A2
GPU Variant
RV670 PRO (215-0708003)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Board Design
182W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon RX 7700
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 8860 OEM
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 6790
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI FirePro V7900
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI Radeon X1950 GT
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI FirePro V3700
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA PG506 232
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI Radeon X550 XTX
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy