Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM and 8GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon PRO W7500 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.0GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7500 +2837%
12.19 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1008 MHz
Memory Clock
1344 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.9GB/s
Bandwidth
172.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
28
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
224 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

14.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.8 GPixel/s
33.15 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
190.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.37 TFLOPS
414.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.19 TFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
380.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Navi 33
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
Navi 33
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
13.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
204 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy