Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs Intel Arc Pro A40

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs Intel Arc Pro A40

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A40 +629%
3.482 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
96bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
DG2-128
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy