Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 205 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (31W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 +960%
0.477 TFLOPS
GeForce 205 OEM
0.045 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Nov 2009
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

24
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
28
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
GT218
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
GT218-200-B1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

182W
TDP
31W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy