Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 219W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition +30%
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Feb 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1134 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
448bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
127.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
30
192
Shading Units
240
64
TMUs
80
28
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.72 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.64 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
219W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
G92B
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
G92-421-B1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy