Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (90W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB +1394%
7.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 30
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1545 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1740 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
16
192
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
64
28
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.127 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.127 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
111.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
90W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
GA107
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
GA107-140-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
65 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy