Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon R9 295X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 295X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon R9 295X2 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 295X2 +1101%
5.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Apr 2014
GeForce 200
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
512bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2816
64
TMUs
176
28
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.15 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.2 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.733 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
716.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Vesuvius
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Vesuvius XT (215-0852022)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy