Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon RX 560D

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon RX 560D

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon RX 560D 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1175MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 560D +341%
2.106 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jul 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1090 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1175 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
14
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.80 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
65.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.106 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.106 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
131.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0b 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Polaris 21
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Polaris 21 XL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy