Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 vs AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 9070 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 220W)
AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock2430MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (624.1GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 9070 XT +4074%
19.91 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
Navi IV(RX 9000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1295 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2430 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2438 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
624.1GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
28
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
64
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
233.3 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
622.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.81 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.91 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
622.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
220W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Navi 48
G200-100-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
4 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
576 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy